Hell hath no fury like the Internet scorned.
While most people were making last-minute preparations for Christmas, the Internet was waging war against a major online company.
The business blitzkrieg was organized on the news aggregate website Reddit, where one user posted that web-hosting service and domain name seller Go Daddy was an open supporter of the controversial Stop Online Piracy Act, a U.S. bill working its way through government into law. The proposed legislation intends to strengthen copyright laws by allowing copyright holders to seek court orders against websites that link to copyrighted material.
Such a law could be the kiss of death to aggregating sites, such as Reddit and Digg, where users gather the most intriguing things on the web and link to them. It could also be highly detrimental to blogs and other sites.
While supporters say the bill will protect copyright holders, critics say it will cripple the Internet.
Back to the web war. So Reddit users called for a boycott of Go Daddy, and customers began pulling their business in droves. Pressure started to mount on high-profile websites, including Imgur — which hosts a large number of photos linked through Reddit. Wikipedia was heavily lobbied, and it, too, promised to pull its business from Go Daddy.
One estimate had Go Daddy losing 20,000 websites a day — a major financial backslap.
With the attack was spiraling out of control, Go Daddy raised the white flag, calling for a truce. The company issued a news release Dec. 23 under the title, “Go Daddy no longer supports SOPA.”
“It’s very important that all Internet stakeholders work together on this. Getting it right is worth the wait. Go Daddy will support it when and if the Internet community supports it,” said the company.
The retreat is an encouragement to web crusaders around the globe —
including here at home where the issue of copyright versus web freedom is particularly timely. The majority Conservative government has been
crafting its own copyright legislation, Bill C-11. Without significant opposition to face down the Tories in the House of Commons, it falls to the Internet community to keep the government accountable to create a law that works for both copyright holders and Internet users.
So far, most of the uproar over the Canadian copyright legislation has centered around stringent digital lock rules. A digital lock, by the way, is a piece of software that limits the way consumers can use a digital product — making copies, for example.
The proposed Canadian law bans circumventing digital locks in any way, shape or form. That means no copying
a book, song or video to put on another device you own.
Consumer groups, business groups and libraries have all come out against this particular bit of Bill C-11.
Parliament is on holidays until Jan. 30. With all those new e-readers, iPods and gaming PCs in Okanagan homes after Christmas and Boxing Day, it may be a good time to get educated on what effect the proposed copyright legislation will have on the digital music, books and games you “own.”
David Wylie is an editor with the Daily Courier. Email him at david.wylie@ok.bc.ca and follow him on Twitter: @editorgeek
* This column first appeared in The Daily Courier newspaper.










